Lack of timely maintenance and repairs main reason for such huge damage to historic monuments
SUJATA AWALEKATHMANDU
The devastating earthquake on April 25,
severely damaged historical and cultural monuments across the country.
According to the Department of Archaeology (DoA), the massive earthquake
has damaged 133 monuments fully, 95 partially collpased and 513
monuments partly damaged. Kathmandu valley renowned as the city of
temples has lost 95 cultural heritage while 357 monuments are partially
damaged.
UNESCO recognises the three Durbar Squares of Kathmandu, Patan and
Bhaktapur, Swayambhunath, Boudhanath, Pashupatinath and Changu Narayan
as World Heritage Zones. Experts stated that lack of timely maintenance
and repairs were the main reason for such huge damage to these
monuments.
According to the DoA, nine historical structures were totally
destroyed while 26 structures are partially damaged in Hanuman Dhoka
Durbar Square. Temples like Char Narayan, Hari Shankar, Taleju and the
two Manimandals of Patan Durbar Square, Vatsala Temple of Bhaktapur
Durbar Square were completely destroyed among many others. While the
Changu Narayan Temple has been given external support, and satals around
the temple has been totally damaged. The main dome of Swayambhunath has
developed cracks while shikara style temples like Shantipur,
Pratappur, Kantipur and Karmaraja Mahabihar have collapsed. Reportedly,
80 per cent of all traditional style residential buildings were fully
damaged in the Swayambhunath area. Boudhanath also has cracks on the
dome, while a few temples in Pashupatinath were partially damaged. A
total of 155 monastries were damaged across the country.
“The earthquake has destroyed many cultural and historically
significant buildings, temples and monuments. The damage in the valley,
in terms of structure, is severe including all seven World Heritage
Zones,” said Bhesh Narayan Dahal, Director General of DoA. Citing that
the relics inside these structures are safe and kept at various museums,
he said, “We plan to respond and work in three different phases for
reconstruction and maintenance — immediate, mid-term and long-term. For
the first phase we have already started the documentation process and
will bring in experts for other aspects of the plan.” According to him,
the government will initiate the rebuilding as per the Procurement Act
through a bidding process.
Dahal informed that they will conduct rebuilding and safeguarding of
World Heritage Monuments as per the Venice Charter’s Article 10 using
traditional artefacts. “As per our analysis, restoration of heritage
both partially and fully damaged would require up to Rs 10 billion and
can be completed within five to seven years,” he asserted, adding that
the release of the full budget should be on time.
Negligence in maintenance
There are clear indications that lack of restoration and maintenance of monuments elevated the extent of damage done by the earthquake. Stakeholders pointed out that lack of proper and timely maintenance of monuments is the reason the country lost numerous historical and cultural heritage.
There are clear indications that lack of restoration and maintenance of monuments elevated the extent of damage done by the earthquake. Stakeholders pointed out that lack of proper and timely maintenance of monuments is the reason the country lost numerous historical and cultural heritage.
“The government purely neglected structural strengthening and
retrofitting of these monuments. It only focused on occasional
beautification of those century old structures,” said Rohit Ranjitkar,
Director of Kathmandu Valley Preservation Trust. Giving the example of
the recently renovated and retrofitted Sundari Chowk, he said, “Not a
single tile has fallen apart from Sundari Chowk on which updated
techniques of retrofitting were applied. On the contrary, the Radha
Krishna Temple at Swotha which was simply renovated in 1991 totally
collapsed.”
He stressed the need for a detailed study of these structures and
restoration with updated techniques to sustain and rebuild heritage
monuments. According to him, the government should learn from the past
and now work to strengthen existing monuments.
Citing that there should be close collaboration between the
government, donor agencies and other organisations, Ranjitkar said, “We
are overwhelmed by the response from various countries and agencies to
help restore these monuments. The government should have a proper plan
to cash in on this opportunity and make use of professional available
help while restoring these monuments.”
There is also the possibility of shortage of required construction
material such as timber, traditional styled bricks and mud with
workmanship to rebuild massive structures, he said, “The government
should give national priority to restoration projects and manage all
tasks efficiently.”
Agreeing with him, Structural Engineer Dr Prem Nath Maskey said,
“While studying monuments which were destroyed, it was clear that the
construction material were past its expiration date.” Citing that
construction material have their own life span, he added, “We found that
the Kasthamandap, Shiva and Visnu Temple along with the Royal Palace in
Hanuman Dhoka were not repaired for years and the structures were weak
with rotten wooden beams and walls.” Maskey opined that it is high time
the government started to initiate heritage conservation tasks using
earthquake resistant techniques to strengthen structures and discuss the
most appropriate approach.
Challenges for restoration
The discussion over what technique should be adopted in the reconstruction of heritage sites is ongoing. Stakeholders are finding greater challenges to deal with partially damaged monuments. They are undecided about whether to retain the remaining structure or to demolish and rebuild them. “Reconstruction of fully demolished monuments will depend on documentation, its significance and available resources. In any case, we will need to plan the entire rehabilitation over a minimum period of six years,” said Kai Weise, Coordinator, Earthquake Response for Cultural Heritage, UNESCO Kathmandu Office.
The discussion over what technique should be adopted in the reconstruction of heritage sites is ongoing. Stakeholders are finding greater challenges to deal with partially damaged monuments. They are undecided about whether to retain the remaining structure or to demolish and rebuild them. “Reconstruction of fully demolished monuments will depend on documentation, its significance and available resources. In any case, we will need to plan the entire rehabilitation over a minimum period of six years,” said Kai Weise, Coordinator, Earthquake Response for Cultural Heritage, UNESCO Kathmandu Office.
Planning ahead
Citing that the most important consideration is the establishment of a coordination system, Weise said, “The rehabilitation of these monuments as well as traditional settlements will be a gigantic task involving lots of organisations and authorities. Coordination would need to ensure that there is no duplication, required expertise is sought or trained, materials are ensured and funds are made available on time and rigorously audited.” He further added that the government will also need to establish a clear set of guidelines to ensure that all involved parties work along similar lines. According to him, the Earthquake Response Coordination Office (ERCO) has already been set up at the Department of Archaeology in close collaboration with UNESCO.
Citing that the most important consideration is the establishment of a coordination system, Weise said, “The rehabilitation of these monuments as well as traditional settlements will be a gigantic task involving lots of organisations and authorities. Coordination would need to ensure that there is no duplication, required expertise is sought or trained, materials are ensured and funds are made available on time and rigorously audited.” He further added that the government will also need to establish a clear set of guidelines to ensure that all involved parties work along similar lines. According to him, the Earthquake Response Coordination Office (ERCO) has already been set up at the Department of Archaeology in close collaboration with UNESCO.
Over 80 years later
Considering the fact that reconstruction of various structures that collapsed during the 1934 earthquake was still being planned even eight decades later, the current restoration process must be considered as a long term endeavour. “An initial six year period has been planned, which will probably allow for some of the most significant monuments to be rebuilt,” Weise informed, adding that during this period all residential buildings must be reconstructed.
Considering the fact that reconstruction of various structures that collapsed during the 1934 earthquake was still being planned even eight decades later, the current restoration process must be considered as a long term endeavour. “An initial six year period has been planned, which will probably allow for some of the most significant monuments to be rebuilt,” Weise informed, adding that during this period all residential buildings must be reconstructed.
Stating that the local community also plays a vital role in
reconstruction, he said, “Many monuments will only be restored through
cooperation from the local community and how they support and see
through this restoration period matters.” According to him, a clear
vision on the process, approach and extent of reconstruction is required
before beginning reconstruction work after the monsoons.